TrackForums

Go Back   TrackForums > Series Forums > Fastrak Series

Fastrak Series This forum is for discussions related to the Fastrak Champion Series. It is in not officially associated with that series. It is simply a way to communicate about it.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-04-2009, 12:40 PM
phillips22's Avatar
phillips22 phillips22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelby N.C.
Posts: 374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HENDRENS RACING ENGINES View Post
You would be surprised at how many problems we see with factory engines.broken rocker studs,valves seized in the guide bad roller lifters,valve seat leakage of 15 % or more.
How would you like to buy a new engine and have a valve stem seize to the guide the first night out? remember there are absolutely no warranty's on these engines. you have one choice,spend another $5000.00 on another new engine.
With a re builder at least you can get it fixed for a couple of hundred dollars and go race
What happens if the engine you bought makes 30 less h.p. than the average? you currently have two choices,buy a new one and gamble again or have yours blueprinted where you know you will have the power that was suppose to be there in the first place? I know what i would do,get it blueprinted and go race knowing i have as much power as any other legal engine. Bill
Funny thing about what you are saying is that Buckinghiam SAID he could be not telling the truth but he said he never rebuilds a motor buys them and puts them in his car right out of the crate!

If I have said it once I have said it 1000 times when Fastrak approved motor builders start competing to have the best rebuilt suppost to be equal motors there is something wrong!

Rebuilds should be handled thru they series/GM and no motor builder should know whos motor they are working on!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-04-2009, 01:04 PM
HookedOnDirt01's Avatar
HookedOnDirt01 HookedOnDirt01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 177
Default

no matter what you do, someone is always going to complain
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-04-2009, 02:25 PM
HENDRENS RACING ENGINES HENDRENS RACING ENGINES is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phillips22 View Post
Funny thing about what you are saying is that Buckinghiam SAID he could be not telling the truth but he said he never rebuilds a motor buys them and puts them in his car right out of the crate!

If I have said it once I have said it 1000 times when Fastrak approved motor builders start competing to have the best rebuilt suppost to be equal motors there is something wrong!

Rebuilds should be handled thru they series/GM and no motor builder should know whos motor they are working on!
First off Buckingham is telling you the truth, he runs stock engines,he is sponsored by Nesmith and if he gets a dead player he just gets another untill he has a good one.

There is no competition between builders that I am aware of. we all have the same set of specs that we have to maintain. its not like an open motor where my hundreds of hours on the dyno with just the cam gives us an advantage on cams over a builder that didn't do the research.

In the case of a crate any engine builder with the correct machines and the ability to maintain exacting standards can produce exactly the same power as I can or any other approved builder. In any case it wouldn't be more power than you could get from a stock G.M. engine that happened to have the tolerance stack up in a favorable way.

As for the engine builder not knowing who owns the engine he is working on,I don't like that idea, that is one way we get customers,its called customer service,what do we have to offer over any other certified builder?,not H.P. there all the same if the builder took the time to make sure everything is to spec. we offer service before,during, and after the sale such as inspecting the car and repairing fuel system problems,polarizing the msd system,checking for the coil orange and black running separately from the mag pick up wires, free chassis dyno time to make sure the engine,fuel system,header system,extensions and car are dialed in. we want our customers in the front and go out of our way to do it.
By the way,all these services are free to our engine customers so they would loose as well as us if engines were assembly line built without knowing the owner . Bill
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-04-2009, 02:44 PM
sdm sdm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 94
Default

We race and I would not like not knowing who built my motor. There are a couple of builders that I do not want a motor from. Hendrens does ours and he does a good job and is helpful.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-04-2009, 03:22 PM
toolman_nc8 toolman_nc8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NC/SC State Line
Posts: 250
Default

2 classes,,leave the 604's where they are at

602 economy class with a possible 2 barrell carb, standard non adjustable gas shocks and 2400 lbs so the older cars can run..

I personally liked the idea of a bigger spec engine but it lost direction.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-04-2009, 04:20 PM
phillips22's Avatar
phillips22 phillips22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelby N.C.
Posts: 374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HENDRENS RACING ENGINES View Post
First off Buckingham is telling you the truth, he runs stock engines,he is sponsored by Nesmith and if he gets a dead player he just gets another untill he has a good one.

There is no competition between builders that I am aware of. we all have the same set of specs that we have to maintain. its not like an open motor where my hundreds of hours on the dyno with just the cam gives us an advantage on cams over a builder that didn't do the research.

In the case of a crate any engine builder with the correct machines and the ability to maintain exacting standards can produce exactly the same power as I can or any other approved builder. In any case it wouldn't be more power than you could get from a stock G.M. engine that happened to have the tolerance stack up in a favorable way.

As for the engine builder not knowing who owns the engine he is working on,I don't like that idea, that is one way we get customers,its called customer service,what do we have to offer over any other certified builder?,not H.P. there all the same if the builder took the time to make sure everything is to spec. we offer service before,during, and after the sale such as inspecting the car and repairing fuel system problems,polarizing the msd system,checking for the coil orange and black running separately from the mag pick up wires, free chassis dyno time to make sure the engine,fuel system,header system,extensions and car are dialed in. we want our customers in the front and go out of our way to do it.
By the way,all these services are free to our engine customers so they would loose as well as us if engines were assembly line built without knowing the owner . Bill
I agree all of that is great but if the motor owner wants and sees fit he can still have you do that work for him after the motor has been bought for a fee that you as a shop can charge for your services!

I think that a builder that goes above and beyond like you do is great my only point is the motor as it comes from GM, and I am not talking about GM going to the builders with the best price or the lowest bid I am talking about every motor builder making the same money for every motor turned out and using the same builders that are inplace right now!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-06-2009, 05:37 PM
DoubleDeucesFan's Avatar
DoubleDeucesFan DoubleDeucesFan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randy smith View Post
Stan we started with the 602 in a GRT and if we were to move the motor back 2 inchs we would have to change the rear motor mount a lot. What if you just made a different race for just the 602 motors, and put rules in place to make it a working man class. So more people with a smaller budget can still race. Example One rule can be, like a claim rule on the motor and on the whole car.
Great idea it is hard to get into crate racing now days. It was originally meant to be ecomomical and I am not saying that it isn't compared to SLM however this would be a great starting point for beginners. I would like to make the suggestion that there also be limits on the carbs, shocks, and a few other things that make getting into crate racing expensive.

DDF
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-07-2009, 08:19 AM
racerm146 racerm146 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 76
Default

Either have a separate class for 602 or adjust the 604 via something simple,carb or weight. IMO the 602 should have been for weekly racing while the 604 for big events. We have both engines and sure as heck dont need to have different driveshafts, etc, to use the 602. Mike
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-07-2009, 09:41 AM
#1dirttracker's Avatar
#1dirttracker #1dirttracker is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: cresent community
Posts: 159
Send a message via AIM to #1dirttracker
Exclamation waaaaaaaaa!

Come on you guys,cant we all just get along?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content of TrackForums.com are to be considered property of Clayton Enterprises. Replication or duplication of posts, images, or content are strictly prohibited.